Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A rapid-flow cytofluorometric susceptibility test for in vitro amphotericin B testing of yeasts was evaluated and compared to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) M27-T reference broth macrodilution method. The flow cytofluorometric method is based on the detection of decreased green fluorescence intensity of cells stained with DiOC5(3), a membrane potential-sensitive cationic dye, after drug treatment. Testing was performed on 134 clinical isolates (Candida spp. and Torulopsis glabrata). From the dose-response curve obtained for each isolate, three endpoints were calculated by computer analysis (the concentrations at which the fluorescence intensity was reduced by 50, 80, and 90%, i.e., 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50], IC80, and IC90, respectively). A regression analysis correlating these endpoints with the M27-T MICs showed that the best agreement was obtained with IC80. The flow cytofluorometric method showed good reproducibility with control strains. These initial results suggest that the flow cytofluorometric method is a valid alternative to the NCCLS reference method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peyron et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: