Should diagnostic testicular sperm retrieval followed by cryopreservation for later ICSI be the procedure of choice for all patients with non-obstructive azoospermia?

BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective study to determine if diagnostic testicular biopsy followed by cryopreservation should be the procedure of choice for all patients with testicular failure. METHODS: The first part of the study analysed 97 ICSI cycles scheduled with frozen-thawed testicular sperm for 69 non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. The second part focused on a subgroup of 32 patients who underwent 42 ICSI cycles with frozen and 44 cycles with fresh testicular sperm. Sperm characteristics, fertilization, embryo quality, pregnancy and implantation rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Part I: The average time needed to find sperm was 113 min per cycle and 17 min per individual sperm. Fertilization rate, embryo transfer rate, ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates were 58.4%, 83%, 20.8% and 11.3%, respectively. Part II: The search time per sperm was higher (P=0.016) in frozen (18 min) than in fresh suspensions (13 min). A higher embryo transfer rate was observed in fresh cycles than in frozen cycles (93.2% vs 76.2%, P=0.028). Fertilization, ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates were comparable for the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a programme with low-restrictive criteria for patient allocation and for sperm cryopreservation, diagnostic testicular biopsy followed by cryopreservation can be the procedure of choice for patients with testicular failure.