This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Imatinib, a name of assurance in the treatment of CML, not only brings significant prognosis and remission but also improves the quality of life of a patient. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imatinib in CML patients. Methods: This study was cross-sectional and multi-centered, starting from 2019-2024 from Sylhet, Chittagong, and Rajshahi. In this study, 529 patients were enrolled. Among them, 442 patients were taken, rest of the patients declined as BCR- ABL1 observed copies were <10,000. Sampling was done by convenient technique. Result: The patients' ages ranged from under 20 to over 80 years, with the majority falling between 21-30 years (25.71%) and 31-40 years (23.25%). The majority of the patients were male (57.66%). According to the analytical result, 442 patients (83.55%) tested positive. Among the 442 participants who tested positive for BCR-ABL1 mRNA, 155 patients (35.07%) were in remission. In contrast, 287 patients (64.93%) were not in remission, with an IS ratio greater than 0.1%. Among the 155 patients classified as in remission according to the IS ratio (≤0.1%), all 155 (100.00%) were also in remission according to the transcript percent ratio (≤10%). The sensitivity of the transcript percent ratio in identifying patients in remission was 100.00%, indicating that all patients in remission according to the IS categorization were also identified as in remission by the transcript percent ratio. The specificity was 36.60%, reflecting a lower ability to correctly identify patients not in remission. Conclusion: In the case of specificity, International-scale and large-scale clinical studies with long-term patient outcomes are more recommended.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halder et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: