Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors evaluated a new Cassette Serum Barbiturates fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) on the COBAS INTEGRA. The assay was calibrated with secobarbital standards at 0, 0.5, and 4.0 microg/mL. The assay range was 0.030 to 80 microg/mL using an automatic 1/20 postdilution feature. Precision was established for two COBAS INTEGRA instruments for ten days by assaying secobarbital target concentrations ranging from 0.125 to 2.2 microg/mL. The coefficients of variation (CV) for the above target concentrations for the first instrument ranged from 2.7% to 8.3%, and for a second instrument, 3.8 to 8.3%. Seven clinically elevated bilirubin samples were spiked with 0.46 and 1.77 microg/mL secobarbital. Bilirubin interference was less than 10.9 and less than 7.9%, respectively. The average recovery ranged from 85% to 94%. The mean difference in recovery in serum versus plasma was < or = 3%. Fifty-two clinical samples were analyzed for butalbital, pentobarbital, secobarbital, and phenobarbital by GC/MS, and the results were compared to the new Cassette Serum Barbiturates FPIA. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 100%, respectively. Both FPIA and GC/MS assays are clinically efficacious for monitoring serum barbiturates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cannon et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: