Molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for three 13-residue peptides of the form AcNH-A-A-E-X-A-E-A-H-A-A-E-K-A-CONH(2) with X = A, F, and W. All three peptides exhibited unexpected dynamical behavior, undergoing a transition from an alpha-helical to a pi-helical structure in the course of 5-ns trajectories in aqueous solution. Analysis of peptide length, accessible surface, interaction energies, hydrogen bonding, and dihedral angles was consistent with alpha --> pi transitions at 2800, 500, and 800 ps for X = A, F and W, respectively. The transitions occurred sequentially and cooperatively, propagating from the C- to the N-terminus for X = A and W and from the center toward both termini for X = F. The time scale of the overall transition ranged from 300 to 500 ps. For all three peptides the backbone structural transition was accompanied by a concerted rearrangement of the charged side chains, including a 3 A increase in the distance between carboxylate groups of Glu-3 and Glu-6. During the transition the peptide backbone hydrogen-bonding patterns were disrupted at the interface between the alpha-helical and nascent pi-helical regions, with peptide groups forming water-bridged hydrogen bonds. The peptide structures exhibited significant fluidity, with individual residues sampling alpha-, pi-, and 3(10)-helical conformations, as well as a "coil" state, without any intramolecular hydrogen bonds. The studied peptides have been designed to form alpha-helices when incorporated in novel hemoprotein model compounds, peptide-sandwiched mesohemes, which consist of two identical peptides covalently attached to an Fe(III) mesoporphyrin [Liu, D., Williamson, D. A., Kennedy, M. L., Williams, T. D., Morton, M. M., and Benson, D. R. (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 11798-11812]. The possibility of adopting pi-helical structures by the constituent peptides may influence the properties of the hemoprotein models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: