Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Command shaping techniques adjust the motion commands to e exible systems so that residual vibration is reduced. However, with so many command shaping methods available, benchmarking is necessary so that the contributions and performance of a particular input can be assessed. A closed-form solution for the move plus settling time of a rigid-body input when applied to a e exible system with damping is developed. The move plus settling time ofthe rigid-body solution creates an upper bound on most feasible solutions forsystems with actuator constraints. A lower bound on the point-to-point motion is the pure move time of the rigid-body input. The usefulness and importance of benchmarking using the rigid-body solution, as well as other inputs, is described. Results emphasize the importance of command shaping when the system damping ratio is less than 0.1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reynolds et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: