Key result
Phylogenetic analysis reveals duck enteritis virus belongs to the Alphaherpesvirinae subfamily as a single group.
DEV is a member of the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae and should be assigned as a single group based on genomic organization and phylogenetic analysis.
DEV phylogeny supports distinct Alphaherpesvirinae assignment; leaves open broader herpesvirus taxonomy validation in veterinary models.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the evolutionary relationship of duck enteritis virus (DEV) in the family Herpesviridae and the genome organization of DEV. METHODS: A modified 'targeted gene walking PCR' method was used to amplify the unknown gene of DEV Clone-03 strain adjacent to a short stretch of known sequence. The assembled unknown fragment was confirmed to be a homologue of herpesviruses by BLAST analysis and comparison with other herpesviruses homologues. Open reading frames (ORFs) were determined and analyzed by Gene Runner software and an online transcriptional element search engine. Two evolutionary analysis approaches were used to conduct phylogenetic trees of DEV in relation to herpesviruses based on the deduced amino acid sequences. RESULTS: A genomic fragment encompassing 25,625 nt and containing 16 ORFs was amplified, determined, and compared with homologues in other herpesviruses. Phylogenetic trees indicated that DEV and other herpesviruses generated from one ancestor and DEV were grouped into the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae. In most cases, DEV showed a close relationship with the genus Mardivirus, but formed a single branch. CONCLUSION: Partial genomic organization and phylogenetic analysis in the present study provides evidence that DEV was a member of the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae and should be assigned as a single group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2008) studied Duck enteritis virus (DEV). Phylogenetic analysis of a 25,625 nt genomic fragment containing 16 ORFs revealed that duck enteritis virus belongs to the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae as a single group.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: