This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study explores the influence of stacking order and sulfurization pressure on the phase evolution, structural properties, and optoelectronic performance of AgSbS 2 thin films. Sulfurizing Sb/Ag and Ag/Sb/Ag stacks at 350 ° C revealed distinct outcomes: the Sb/Ag stack produced compact, phase-pure cubic AgSbS 2 with a direct bandgap of 1.61 eV and high hole mobility (84 cm 2 V −1 s 2 ), while the Ag/Sb/Ag stack contained Ag 3 SbS 3 impurities and exhibited reduced electrical performance. Sulfurization pressures from 750 Torr to 7.5 Torr significantly impacted crystallinity, phase composition, and grain morphology. Higher pressures favored phase-pure cubic AgSbS 2 with enhanced compactness, while lower pressures promoted impurities and reduced film quality. The AgSbS 2 solar cells fabricated from the Sb/Ag stack achieved 0.95% efficiency (V OC of 519.2 mV, J SC of 6.11 mA/cm 2 , FF of 30.0%), surpassing the efficiency of the Ag/Sb/Ag stack (0.7% efficiency, V OC of 513.4 mV, J SC of 4.45 mA/cm 2 , FF of 32.6%) due to improved phase purity. • Impacts of stacking order and (N 2 +S 2 ) pressure on AgSbS 2 phase evolution explored. • The Sb/Ag stack produced phase-pure AgSbS 2 films with better physical properties. • The Ag/Sb/Ag stack enhanced grain growth and Ag 3 SbS 3 impurity phase formation. • Higher pressure favored pure AgSbS 2 , while lower pressure induced Ag 3 SbS 3 phase. • Solar cells with Sb/Ag stack achieved an η of 0.95%, surpassing Ag/Sb/Ag (0.7%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: