Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Concentrations of fifteen trace metals including Aluminum (Al), Vanadium (V), Chromium (Cr), Manganese (Mn), Iron (Fe), Strontium (Sr), Molybdenum (Mo), Silver (Ag), Cadmium (Cd), Tin (Sn), Caesium (Cs), Barium (Ba), Lead (Pb), Bismuth (Bi) and Uranium (U) were investigated in water samples collected from sixteen sampling locations in the Lubumbashi river basin and five locations in Kafubu, Kimilolo and Kinkalabwamba rivers during February, March and April 2016.Chemical analyses of the samples were carried out using ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer).Water pH was determined using a pH-meter and pH values ranged from 4.2 to 7.8.The highest mean trace metal levels of water were 5,515.816µgL -1 , 166.925 µgL -1 , 3.898 µgL -1 and 1.879 µgL -1 for Al, Ba, Cr and U, respectively in Kashobwe river, 2,419.522µgL -1 and 17.994 µgL -1 for Fe and Cd, respectively in Kafubu river at its confluence with Lubumbashi rivers, 1,408.136µgL -1 for Mn in Kafubu river 1.36 kilometer downward its confluence with Naviundu river, 222.406 µgL -1 and 0.092 µgL -1 for Sr and Cs, respectively in Kamalondo river 60 meters from the GCM-Lubumbashi (General of Quarries and Mines-Lubumbashi) smelter, 140.294 µgL -1 , 12.063 µgL -1 and 0.008 µgL -1 for Pb, V and Bi, respectively in Munua river, 3.544 µgL -1 for Ag in Kabulameshi river, 1.49 µgL -1 for Mo in Kafubu river and 0.081 µgL -1 for Sn in Tshondo river.The mean concentrations of Al, Cd, Fe, Mn and Pb in water of many rivers and the channel exceeded the maximum admissible limits of the WHO (World Health Organization), USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) and EU (European Union) drinking-water standards.Trace metal contamination of water of the studied rivers, channel and springs might be partially attributed to natural processes, unplanned urbanization, poor waste management and mostly to abandoned and ongoing mining and ore processing activities in Lubumbashi city.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhaya et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: