Key result
This is an editorial discussing journal updates and acknowledging reviewers for Hypertension Research, containing no clinical trial data.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An editorial updating readers on the progress, review processes, and future directions of the journal Hypertension Research in 2012.
In 2011, the 3rd year of Hypertension Research in its current format and platform (for online content), we again were kept busy working to further grow this journal. We have focused more on the ‘everyday workings’ of the journal, trying to be more selective and efficient in reviewing papers, in order to further improve the quality of the content. Some of these improvements have more to do with our work procedures and so may not be very visible to our readers. Herein, I would like to introduce some of these changes that were made in 2011.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masatsugu Horiuchi (2012) reported an editorial. This is an editorial discussing journal updates and acknowledging reviewers for Hypertension Research, containing no clinical trial data.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: