Key result
Women are ~7% less likely than men to use cardioprotective medications after a diabetes diagnosis.
Why the study?
Does female sex reduce the likelihood of cardioprotective medication use in adults with new-onset diabetes?
Cohort (n=33,294)
Does female sex reduce the likelihood of cardioprotective medication use in adults with new-onset diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 0.93 (95% CI 0.9–0.97)
Absolute Event Rate: 53% vs 54.2%
Women with new-onset diabetes are significantly less likely to receive evidence-based cardioprotective medications (statins, ACEi/ARBs) compared to men, highlighting a critical sex-based gap in cardiovascular prevention.
Sex differences in cardioprotective medication use may signal disparities; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes in high-risk groups.
OBJECTIVE: The identification of sex-based disparities in the use of effective medications in high-risk populations can lead to interventions to minimize disparities in health outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine sex-specific rates of cardioprotective medication use in a large population-level administrative-health database from a universal-payer environment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational, population-based cohort study used provincial administrative data to compare the utilization of cardioprotective medications between women and men in the first year following a diabetes diagnosis. Competing risks regression was used to calculate crude and adjusted sub-hazard ratios for time-to-first angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, or statin dispensations. RESULTS: There were 15,120 (45.4%) women and 18,174 (54.6%) men with diabetes in the study cohort. Overall cardioprotective medication use was low for both primary and secondary prevention for both women and men. In the year following a diabetes diagnosis, women were less likely to use a statin relative to men (adjusted sub-hazard ratio [aSHR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 0.96), angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (aSHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.94), or any cardioprotective medication (aSHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Cardioprotective medication use was not optimal in women or men. We also identified a health care gap with cardioprotective medication use being lower in women with diabetes compared to men. Closing this gap has the potential to reduce the impact of cardiovascular disease in women with diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butalia et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Diabetes (n=33,294). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Time-to-first dispensation of any cardioprotective medication (statin, ACEi, or ARB) in the 365 days following diabetes diagnosis (aSHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). In the year following a diabetes diagnosis, women were 7% less likely to use any cardioprotective medication compared to men (aSHR 0.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: