Key result
Prucalopride did not increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to polyethylene glycol 3350 in patients with chronic constipation (IRR 0.64), remaining below the pre-specified safety threshold of 3.00.
Why the study?
Prucalopride approval in the European Union provided an opportunity to assess real-world cardiovascular safety data for its new drug application in the USA.
Does prucalopride increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to polyethylene glycol 3350 in adults with chronic constipation?
Cohort (n=35,087)
Yes
Does prucalopride increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to polyethylene glycol 3350 in adults with chronic constipation?
Prucalopride does not appear to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to PEG in patients with chronic constipation.
Supports prucalopride cardiovascular safety in observational data; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before changing practice.
INTRODUCTION: receptor agonist prucalopride is approved in the European Union for the treatment of chronic constipation. This offered the unique opportunity to include real-world observational data on cardiovascular safety in the new drug application for approval of prucalopride in the USA. METHODS: This observational population-based cohort study (EUPAS9200) conducted in five data sources (three in the UK, one in Sweden, and one in Germany [which was subsequently excluded from the pooled analyses]) aimed to estimate the pooled adjusted incidence rate ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events (defined as hospitalization for non-fatal acute myocardial infarction or stroke, and in-hospital cardiovascular death) in adult initiators of prucalopride compared with initiators of polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG) following a common protocol. Standardized incidence rates and incidence rate ratios of major adverse cardiovascular events were derived using propensity score stratification. Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of exposure definition, outcome categories, interim cancer, and unmeasured confounding. RESULTS: The pooled analyses included 5715 initiators of prucalopride and 29,372 initiators of PEG. Average duration of use was 175 days for prucalopride and 82 days for PEG. The pooled standardized incidence rate per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval) of major adverse cardiovascular events was 6.57 (3.90-10.39) for patients initiating prucalopride and 10.24 (6.97-14.13) for PEG. The pooled adjusted incidence rate ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events was 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.36-1.14). Results remained consistent in various sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled incidence rate ratio estimate was consistent with no indication of an increased risk above the pre-specified safety threshold of 3.00 for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic constipation using prucalopride as compared with PEG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilsenan et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Chronic constipation (n=35,087). Prucalopride vs. Polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: hospitalization for non-fatal acute myocardial infarction or stroke, and in-hospital cardiovascular death) (IRR 0.64, 95% CI 0.36-1.14). Prucalopride did not increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to polyethylene glycol 3350 in patients with chronic constipation (IRR 0.64), remaining below the pre-specified safety threshold of 3.00.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: