Cu electrode-based electrochemical CO 2 reduction using renewable energy is a promising method for conversion of CO 2 to useful compounds such as methane, ethylene, and ethanol. Heteroatom-doped and/or -derived Cu as oxide-derived Cu has been investigated in context of development of a stable catalyst with high selectivity, whereas the role of heteroatoms is not yet well understood. It is not known whether heteroatoms act as a moiety of the catalyst or simply induce reconstruction of the catalyst. This work is an investigation of the role of the heteroatom in electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction with a Cu electrode modified with methanethiol monolayers (MT–Cu), which is able to distinguish the presence of heteroatom contamination originating from electrolyte or air. Controlled potential electrolysis of CO 2 using an MT–Cu electrode at −1.8 V at Ag/AgCl exhibits greater selectivity for C 2 products than an unmodified polycrystalline Cu electrode (bare Cu). On the other hand, a sulfur-modified Cu (S–Cu) electrode predominantly generates formate as a CO 2 reduction product. In an investigation of the mechanism, an in situ attenuated total reflection surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy instrument is used as a powerful surface analyzer. Scanning electron microscopy, grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS), and X-ray spectroscopy (XPS) are also employed in the investigation. The spectroscopic data show that reconstruction and formation of Cu + on the Cu surface occur at negative potential greater than −1.4 V vs Ag/AgCl by electrochemical reduction of methanethiol monolayers. DFT calculations are also performed under conditions close to the experimental conditions of electrical bias and aqueous electrolyte. The results indicate that a roughened surface is favorable for generating C 2 products. In addition, the Cu + moiety promotes generation of C 2 products, demonstrating that the doped heteroatom plays a crucial role in electrochemical CO 2 reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iijima et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: