Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: Despite the effectiveness of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy to control HIV infection, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain frequent. The Neuro+3 study assessed the cognitive improvement associated with ARV intensification based on increased CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) scoring ≥+3 and total CPE score ≥9. METHODS: Thirty-one patients, aged 18-65 years, with confirmed diagnosis of HAND and effective ARV therapy were included. The cognitive improvement was measured using Frascati three-stage classification and global deficit score (GDS) after 48 and 96 weeks of ARV intensification. Ultrasensitive HIV-RNA, neopterin, soluble CD14, CCL2, CXCL10, IL6, IL8 and NF-L were measured in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid at Day 0 (baseline), Week 48 (W48) and W96. RESULTS: The intensified ARV was associated with a median (IQR) CPE score increase from 6 (4-7) at baseline to 10 (9-11). From baseline to W96, the median (IQR) GDS decreased from 1.4 (0.8-2.2) to 1.0 (0.6-2.0) (P = 0.009); HAND classification improved from 2 to 1 HIV-associated dementia, 22 to 8 mild neurocognitive disorders, 7 to 17 asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment and 0 to 5 patients without any neurocognitive alterations (P = 0.001). In multivariable linear regression analysis, GDS improvement at W96 was significantly associated with CPE score ≥9 after intensification (P = 0.014), CD4 lymphocyte increase at W48 (P < 0.001) and plasma CXCL10 decrease at W96 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HAND, a significant cognitive improvement was observed after the ARV intensification strategy, with a higher CPE score. Cognitive improvement was more often observed in the case of a switch of two drug classes, arguing for better control of CNS HIV immune activation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Force et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: