Key result
The RVs-LVs interval during intrinsic rhythm predicted CRT response, with patients having LBBB and RVs-LV1s ≥34 ms showing the greatest response.
Why the study?
Quadripolar LV leads can sense and pace from 4 electrodes, potentially improving CRT response, but the association between specific intracardiac conduction time intervals and CRT response was unclear.
Do intracardiac conduction intervals predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients receiving a CRT-defibrillator?
Cohort (n=196)
Do intracardiac conduction intervals predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients receiving a CRT-defibrillator?
p-value: p=.006
The right ventricular-sensed to left ventricular-sensed (RVs-LVs) interval during intrinsic rhythm is a significant predictor of CRT response, particularly in patients with LBBB.
BACKGROUND: Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads are capable of sensing and pacing the left ventricle from 4 different electrodes, which may potentially improve patient response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVE: We measured 3 different time intervals: right ventricular (RV)-sensed to LV-sensed during intrinsic rhythm (RVs-LVs), RV-paced to LV-sensed (RVp-LVs), and LV-paced to LV-sensed (LVp-LVs, between distal [LV1] and proximal pole on a quadripolar LV lead), and assessed their association with CRT response in terms of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and a composite benefit index (CBI) comprising LVESV, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide level, and NYHA class. METHODS: A CRT-defibrillator system with quadripolar LV lead was implanted in 196 patients (mean age 69 years, mean LVEF 30%, left bundle-branch block [LBBB] 58%). Conduction intervals were measured before hospital discharge. At baseline and 7-month follow-up, echocardiographic and other components of CBI were determined. RESULTS: = .006). In contrast, RVp-LV1s did not correlate and LVp-LVs correlated only weakly with CRT response. The subgroup of patients (44%) with LBBB and RVs-LV1s above the lower quartile (≥34 ms) showed the greatest response to CRT. CONCLUSION: The RVs-LVs interval during intrinsic rhythm is relevant for CRT success, whereas RVp-LVs and LVp-LVs intervals did not predict CRT response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soejima et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=196). RVs-LVs interval during intrinsic rhythm was evaluated on CRT response in terms of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and a composite benefit index (CBI) (p=.006). The RVs-LVs interval during intrinsic rhythm predicted CRT response, with patients having LBBB and RVs-LV1s ≥34 ms showing the greatest response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: