OBJECTIVE: There has been major controversy regarding the long term risk of death associated with the use of paclitaxel coated devices in the lower limbs. The authors performed a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Data sources included published literature and repositories of regulatory agencies. REVIEW Survival differences were summarised with the non-parametric statistical tests of the difference and the ratio of restricted mean survival time lost (RMTL). RESULTS: Thirty-four randomised studies with 7 486 subjects and 25 465 person years were included, more than twice the size of the latest industry sponsored meta-analysis for regulatory purposes. In the long term, there were 575 deaths amongst 4 231 patients in the paclitaxel arms (13.6% crude risk) vs. 367 deaths amongst 3 255 patients in the control arms (11.3% crude risk), with an average hazard ratio (HR) of 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 - 1.35; p = .015). The RMTL ratio (non-parametric analogue of HR) was 1.21 times (95% CI 1.07 - 1.38; p = .003) at 5 years. The absolute RMTL difference was 0.08 years (95% CI 0.03 - 0.13; p = .004) at 5 years. The HR significantly varied over time, displaying a dynamic temporal pattern. Soon after treatment, HR progressively increased and became statistically significantly higher before the end of the first year and for most of the second year (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11 - 1.89; p = .007), before declining towards unity (neutral) again up to 5 years. There was modest between trial heterogeneity (θ = 0.083; p = .017) and level of certainty by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was moderate. CONCLUSION: There is a significant, dynamic increase in all cause mortality following application of paclitaxel coated devices in the femoropopliteal artery.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Although restenosis, patency, and TLR remain important procedural outcomes, patients and clinicians are ultimately concerned with limb preservation, symptom relief, and avoidance of repeat interventions. The SirPAD trial findings demonstrate that the benefits of DCB technology can translate into...”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsanos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: