PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 16, 2026Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

When similar is not the same: sex-specific outcomes and risk factors in thoracoabdominal aortic repair

FHFlorian HelmsHKHeike KrügerEDEzin Deniz

Key Result

Female sex was not associated with a significant difference in 30-day mortality compared to male sex (12.2% vs 17.1%, p=0.377) after propensity score matching for thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=311)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does female sex compared to male sex affect mortality and outcomes in patients undergoing open surgical thoracoabdominal aortic repair?

P
Population
311 consecutive patients (31.8% female, median age 62) undergoing open surgical thoracoabdominal aortic repair between 2000 and 2024, followed for a median of 6.9 years.
E
Exposure
Female sex
C
Comparator
Male sex
O
Outcome
Short- and long-term mortalityhard clinical

While overall survival following open thoracoabdominal aortic repair is comparable between sexes, the predictors of early mortality differ fundamentally, highlighting the need for sex-specific preoperative risk assessment.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 12.2% vs 17.1%

p-value: p=0.377

Limitations

  • Retrospective single-center design
  • Low absolute numbers of events per variable in the sex-specific risk factor analysis
  • Cause of death in long-term follow-up (aortic vs non-aortic) is unknown in a relevant proportion of the study population

Abstract

Objective Growing evidence suggests major outcome and risk factor disparities between men and women undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Thus, sex-specific approaches are increasingly being adopted in cardiovascular medicine. However, data on sex-specific outcomes and risk stratification in complex thoracoabdominal aortic repair remain limited. Methods We present a retrospective single-center analysis of 311 consecutive patients, including 99 women (31.8%), who underwent open surgical thoracoabdominal aortic repair between 2000 and 2024. Propensity score matching was performed prior to a comparative analysis of intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcome, and complications, as well as short- and long-term mortality between female and male patients. Results In the initial study population, men had a significantly higher BMI (26.3 vs. 23.1 kg/m 2 , p < 0.001) and greater prevalence of coronary artery disease (37.7% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.004) and hyperlipidemia (27.8% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.002) compared to women. Postoperatively, wound infections were more frequent in women in the unmatched cohort (12.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.01), but no sex-related differences in mortality, ICU length of stay, or long-term survival were observed after propensity score matching. Multivariate regression revealed highly distinct predictors of early mortality in each sex: prior cardiac surgery and urgency in men versus hypertension, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, and older age at the time of operation in women. Conclusion Overall outcomes and survival following thoracoabdominal aortic repair were comparable between men and women. However, underlying risk factors for early mortality differed fundamentally between sexes. These findings underscore the importance of a sex-specific preoperative risk assessment in the surgical decision-making process prior to open thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Helms et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n=311). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on 30-day mortality (propensity-matched cohort) (p=0.377). Female sex was not associated with a significant difference in 30-day mortality compared to male sex (12.2% vs 17.1%, p=0.377) after propensity score matching for thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa20e30e42d107f4a3b36cahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1734089
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper