Retrospective cohort study reveals rare rapid intrasegmental progression after radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting tumor marker monitoring for early systemic therapy.
AIM: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is curative therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but a rare subset of patients develop aggressive intrasegmental recurrence shortly after complete ablation. We characterized the incidence, risk factors, and absolute risk. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients with HCC treated with RFA from August 2002 to December 2024. Rapid progression was defined as recurrence at the ablation margin within 6 months that precluded further locoregional therapy. Cases were matched 1 to 4 with controls based on treatment era, prior RFA sessions, tumor diameter, and tumor number. Preablation imaging and tumor marker dynamics were compared, and absolute risk was estimated. RESULTS: Among 3163 patients who underwent 10,240 RFA treatments, 20 (0.20%) met criteria for rapid progression. Aggressive imaging features including nonsmooth margins (OR 5.87, 95% CI 1.80-19.12) and multinodular confluent growth (OR 3.84, 95% CI 1.30-11.36) were significantly more common in the rapid progression group, though positive predictive values remained below 1%. Irregular rim-like hyperenhancement was present in 15% of rapid progression cases but was absent in all controls. Periportal location accounted for half of the rapid progression cases (OR 2.84, 95% CI 0.97-8.29). Tumor markers including alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin declined after RFA in controls but not in the rapid progression group. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive imaging features and insufficient post-ablation tumor marker decline were associated with rapid progression, though individual predictive value was low. Tumor marker trends may help guide surveillance and earlier transition to systemic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: