Key result
Older age, lower EF, and longer cross-clamp times are linked to requiring pacing on CVICU arrival.
Why the study?
Routine temporary epicardial pacing wire placement after cardiac surgery causes complications, making identification of predictors for requiring pacing beneficial to guide selective placement.
What are the predictors of requiring temporary epicardial pacing immediately following cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=11,752)
No
What are the predictors of requiring temporary epicardial pacing immediately following cardiac surgery?
Specific clinical and procedural risk factors, including older age, lower EF, and longer cross-clamp times, can predict the need for temporary epicardial pacing after cardiac surgery, potentially guiding selective wire placement.
May inform selective epicardial wire placement post-surgery; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires (TEPW) at the end of open heart surgery cases is routine but can be associated with complications. Identification of patients who are high risk for requiring pacing would be beneficial on guiding selective TEPW placement. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of temporary pacing immediately post cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery from 2005 to 2016 at the Maritime Heart Center was conducted. Analysis was performed of patients who require pacing on arrival to the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) compared with those who were not paced. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine each variable's risk adjusted likelihood of pacing for the entire cohort. Subgroup analysis was performed in the isolated procedures. RESULTS: A total of 11 752 patient underwent surgery from the year 2005 to 2016. Two thousand and fifty-one (17.5%) required pacing on arrival to CVICU. Older age, female sex, preoperative renal failure, lower ejection fraction (EF), preoperative arrhythmia, preoperative use of calcium channel blockers, and longer cross-clamp times were risk factors for pacing. In the isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement groups, findings were similar to the overall cohort. Only age, obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were risk factors for pacing in the isolated mitral valve (MV) repair group and only preoperative arrhythmia in the isolated MV replacement group. CONCLUSION: We have identified risk factors for TEPW use following cardiac surgery and in isolated procedure subgroups. These risk factors may help guide selective TEPW placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Côté et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Cardiac surgery (n=11,752). Risk factors (older age, female sex, renal failure, lower EF, arrhythmia, calcium channel blockers, longer cross-clamp times) vs. Patients without these risk factors was evaluated on Requiring pacing on arrival to the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU). Older age, female sex, renal failure, lower EF, arrhythmia, calcium channel blockers, and longer cross-clamp times were identified as risk factors for requiring pacing on CVICU arrival (17.5% overall).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: