We consider the relative merits of various saddlepoint approximations for the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of a statistic with a possibly non normal limit distribution. In addition to the usual Lugannani-Rice approximation, we also consider approximations based on higher-order expansions, including the case where the base distribution for the approximation is taken to be non normal. This extends earlier work by Wood et al. (1993 Wood , A. T. A. , Booth , J. G. , Butler , R. W. ( 1993 ). Saddlepoint approximations to the CDF of some statistics with nonnormal limit distributions . Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 : 680 – 686 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). These approximations are applied to the distribution of the Anderson-Darling test statistic. While these generalizations perform well in the middle of the distribution's support, a conventional normal-based Lugannani-Rice approximation (Giles, 2001 Giles , D. E. A. ( 2001 ). A Saddlepoint approximation to the distribution function of the Anderson-Darling test statistic . Communications in Statistics B 30 : 899 – 905 .[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) is superior for conventional critical regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: