This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Brain tumor therapy remains limited by an immunosuppressive, monotherapy-resistant tumor microenvironment and by a paucity of technologies capable of controlling therapy delivery kinetics to the tumor. Here, we describe tissue-adhesive hydrogel-drug complexes (HDCs) for the controlled release of combination therapies synchronized with immune cycle responses following intracranial administration. Injected adhesive HDCs enabled the controlled co-delivery of multiple payloads (chemotherapy, stimulator of interferon genes agonist cyclic dinucleotide nanoparticles, immune checkpoint blockade antibodies), leading to enhanced long-term survival (>80%) and protection from contralateral hemisphere rechallenge after a single dose in multiple syngeneic orthotopic glioblastoma mouse models. Mechanistic studies revealed that tumor rejection is a consequence of reprogramming the tumor microenvironment, driven by three key phases: the initial rapid expression of inflammatory cytokines, notably IFN-γ, and tumor sensitization with antigen exposure during chemoimmunotherapy release, followed by the recruitment and subsequent sustained activation of antigen-presenting and effector cells facilitated by the hydrogel’s multiweek delivery period. These findings point to tissue-adhesive HDCs, and therapeutic release synchronized with biological responses as key considerations for realizing robust immune activation without provoking toxicity in the treatment of solid tumors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dion et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: