Key result
Brachial pulse derivative correlates highly with the conventional carotid method for measuring systolic time intervals.
Why the study?
Does the first derivative of the indirect brachial arterial pulse provide an accurate alternative to the carotid pulse for measuring systolic time intervals in subjects with heart disease?
Observational (n=81)
Does the first derivative of the indirect brachial arterial pulse provide an accurate alternative to the carotid pulse for measuring systolic time intervals in subjects with heart disease?
The first derivative of the indirect brachial arterial pulse is a reliable alternative to the carotid pulse for measuring systolic time intervals when carotid recordings are technically difficult.
May facilitate systolic time interval assessment when carotid recording is challenging; leaves open further validation before routine use.
Technical difficulties occasionally preclude adequate recording of the indirect carotid pulsations needed for measuring the systolic time intervals by the conventional method. Accordingly, in 81 subjects with a wide spectrum of heart diseases, an alternative method was tested based on substituting the first time derivative of the indirect brachial arterial pulse for the carotid pulse. The observed differences between systolic time intervals measured by the two methods were small enough, and their correlation coefficients high enough, to inspire confidence in the use of the proposed method as an alternative way for determining systolic time intervals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefadouros et al. (1981) conducted an observational in Heart diseases (n=81). First time derivative of the indirect brachial arterial pulse vs. Indirect carotid pulsations (conventional method) was evaluated on Systolic time intervals. Measuring systolic time intervals using the first derivative of the indirect brachial arterial pulse showed small differences and high correlation with the conventional carotid pulse method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: