Key result
Cardiometabolic risk factor models predict obstructive CAD with an AUC of 0.82.
Why the study?
The study was designed to develop predictive models of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with NSTE-ACS using cardiometabolic risk factors.
Can cardiometabolic risk factors accurately predict obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with NSTE-ACS prior to invasive angiography?
Cohort (n=495)
Can cardiometabolic risk factors accurately predict obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with NSTE-ACS prior to invasive angiography?
A predictive algorithm based on cardiometabolic risk factors can accurately predict the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease in NSTE-ACS patients before invasive angiography.
Aim. To develop predictive models of obstructive coronary artery disease (OPCA) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) based on the predictive potential of cardiometabolic risk (CMR) factors. Material and methods. This prospective observational cohort study included 495 patients with NSTE-ACS (median age, 62 years; 95% confidence interval [60; 64]), who underwent invasive coronary angiography (CAG). Two groups of persons were identified, the first of which consisted of 345 (69,6%) patients with OPCA (stenosis ≥50%), and the second — 150 (30,4%) without OPCA (<50%). The clinical and functional status of patients before CAG was assessed including 29 parameters. For data processing and analysis, the Mann-Whitney, Fisher, chi-squared tests and univariate logistic regression (LR) were used. In addition, for the development of predictive models, we used multivariate LR (MLR), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). The models was assessed using 4 metrics: area under the ROC-curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results. A comprehensive analysis of functional and metabolic status of patients made it possible to identify the CMR factors that have linear and nonlinear association with OPCA. Their weighting coefficients and threshold values with the highest predictive potential were determined using univariate LR. The quality metrics of the best predictive algorithm based on an ensemble of 10 MLR models were as follows: AUC — 0,82, specificity and accuracy — 0,73, sensitivity — 0,75. The predictors of this model were 7 categorical (total cholesterol (CS) ≥5,9 mmol/L, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >3,5 mmol/L, waist-to-hip ratio ≥0,9, waist-to-height ratio ≥0,69, atherogenic index ≥3,4, lipid accumulation product index ≥38,5 cm*mmol/L, uric acid ≥356 pmol/L) and 2 continuous (high density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin resistance index) variables. Conclusion. The developed algorithm for selecting predictors made it possible to determine their significant predictive threshold values and weighting coefficients characterizing the degree of influence on endpoints. The ensemble of MLR models demonstrated the highest accuracy of OPCA prediction before the CAG. The predictive accuracy of the SVM and RF models was significantly lower.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geltser et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (n=495). Cardiometabolic risk factors was evaluated on Prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease (stenosis ≥50%) (AUC 0.82). An ensemble of multivariate logistic regression models using cardiometabolic risk factors predicted obstructive coronary artery disease with an AUC of 0.82, sensitivity of 0.75, and accuracy of 0.73.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: