Key result
Male sex is linked to ~14% greater carotid IMT, driven entirely by waist-to-hip ratio.
Why the study?
Does central adiposity explain sex differences in carotid intima media thickness in adults aged 56-75 years?
Cross-Sectional (n=800)
Yes
Does central adiposity explain sex differences in carotid intima media thickness in adults aged 56-75 years?
Effect estimate: Ratio of geometric means 1.14 (95% CI 1.07-1.21)
Sex differences in body fat distribution, specifically central adiposity, appear to explain the observed sex differences in carotid intima media thickness.
Central adiposity may mediate sex differences in carotid IMT; leaves open causal role, needs prospective confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of central adiposity in explaining sex differences in carotid intima media thickness (IMT). DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. SETTING: Two British towns. PARTICIPANTS: 800 men and women aged 56-75 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Carotid IMT. RESULTS: There was a continuous linear association between waist-hip ratio and IMT in both men and women. The magnitude of the association between waist to hip ratio and IMT was identical in both sexes. In age adjusted analyses IMT was 14% greater in men compared with women (age adjusted male to female ratio of geometric means 1.14; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.21) with adjustment for waist to hip ratio this attenuated to no difference (1.00; 0.92 to 1.09). Adjustment for body mass index and for lifestyle risk factors had very little effect on the sex difference in mean intima media thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in body fat distribution may explain sex differences in arterial atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Debbie A. Lawlor (2004) reported a cross-sectional. Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Carotid IMT (Ratio of geometric means 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21). Male sex was associated with 14% greater carotid IMT than female sex (ratio of geometric means 1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.21), which attenuated to no difference after adjusting for waist-to-hip ratio.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: