A number of 5-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-hexahydro-azepino-[4, 5-b]indoles 3 were synthesized with different substituents at the azepine-N position (methyl-, allyl-, 2-phenyl-ethyl-, cyclopropylmethyl- and unsubstituted). Furthermore, the indole-N-methylated compound was generated and by using norephedrines and norpseudoephedrines as a chiral pool, 4-methyl-5-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-hexahydro-azepino-[4, 5-b]indoles were prepared which contained racemisation at the reacting C-atom. These compounds, as well as the ring-open amino-alcohols, were screened for their affinity to the hD(1)-, hD(5)-, hD(2L)-, and hD(4)-receptors (ç please check sentence). They had micromolar affinities for the receptors and showed the highest affinity to the D(1)-subtype family. The cyclic compounds possessed the highest affinity, with the cyclopropylmethyl-(3c) and methyl-substituents (3 e) being the most active of the tested compounds. Based on an intracellular cAMP-assay, the unsubstituted compound (at the azepine-N position) turned out to be an agonist for the D(1)-and D(5)-subtype family, whereas the substituted compounds showed (partial) agonistic, or even inverse agonistic activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Decker et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: