PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1996Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery202 citationsOpen Access

Postoperative assessment of shoulder function: A prospective study of full-thickness rotator cuff tears

View Full Paper
JIJoseph P. IannottiMBMarjana BernotJKJeffrey R. Kuhlman

Key Result

Surgery for chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff defects yielded 88% good or excellent results at 2 years, with postoperative scores correlating most closely with preoperative tear size.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=40)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

What preoperative and intraoperative factors influence postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for full-thickness rotator cuff tears?

P
Population
40 patients with chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff defects who underwent surgery and were followed for 2 years.
E
Exposure
Surgery for rotator cuff repair
O
Outcome
Postoperative outcome including objective measures of shoulder function, postoperative symptoms, patient satisfaction, and disability at 2 yearspatient reported

Preoperative tear size is a strong prognostic factor for postoperative function and satisfaction following surgery for full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Abstract

Forty patients underwent surgery by a single surgeon for chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff defects. The study evaluated preoperative and intraoperative factors that influence postoperative outcome. The study also correlated objective measures of shoulder function with postoperative symptoms, patient satisfaction, and disability. Follow-up history and physical examination and strength measurements were performed at 2 years after surgery by three independent observers. There were 88% good or excellent results. Postscores correlated most closely with preoperative tear size. Postoperative Constant scores also correlated significantly with the patient's subjective rating of the end result. Preoperative cuff tear size also correlated with the presence of postoperative fatigue symptoms and objective measures of shoulder strength. Preoperative cuff tear size strongly correlated with other prognostic factors including the quality of the tendon tissue, the difficulty for tendon mobilization, and the presence of a rupture of the long head of the biceps. Together these factors adversely affect postoperative function, patient satisfaction, and overall shoulder score. Neither premorbid activity level nor the presence of a worker's compensation claim adversely affected the postoperative Constant score. The premorbid activity level significantly influenced the postoperative disability rating and the ability to return to work. All patients who were gainfully employed before surgery returned to employment after surgery, although in some patients at a lesser activity level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iannotti et al. (1996) conducted a cohort in Chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff defects (n=40). Surgery for full-thickness rotator cuff tears was evaluated on Good or excellent results (shoulder function). Surgery for chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff defects yielded 88% good or excellent results at 2 years, with postoperative scores correlating most closely with preoperative tear size.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa23397196cc6299dd3cdc0https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(96)80017-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper