It is customary when computing ro−vibrational transitions in molecules to invoke the Born−Oppenheimer separation between nuclear and electronic motion. However, it is known from accurate calculations on H 2 + and H 2 that the first-order (diagonal adiabatic) and second-order (nonadiabatic) corrections are not negligible and are both important. In the present work, we have made an ab initio implementation of the Bunker and Moss formalism for the nonadiabatic correction and applied it to H 2 and H 2 O. From comparison to accurate calculations for H 2, we find that we can obtain good results for the nonadiabatic correction using CI singles to treat the electronically excited states if we scale the results, but we must go beyond the SCF approximation to obtain an accurate diagonal adiabatic correction. For H 2 O, we find that the first-order correction is more important than the second-order correction for bending energy levels, but the second-order correction is more important than the first-order correction for stretching energy levels. The correction to rotational levels is also significant. Thus, first- and second-order corrections are vital for accurate ab initio predictions of transition frequencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David W. Schwenke (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: