Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The influence of the Pt‐Ru anode loading and MEA preparation techniques on direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) performance is studied. Two different anode catalyst layer preparation techniques are employed. One is the direct coating of anode catalyst ink on a membrane to form a catalyst coated membrane, CCManode, and the other is the coating of the ink on the diffusion layers, which generates a catalyst coated substrate, CCSanode. The power density of a combined CCManode/CCScathodeMEA is higher than for a CCSanode/CCScathodeMEA. The main difference in the performance is observed in the high current density region, where two‐phase flow is present and mass transfer processes govern the performance. The CCManodeand CCSanodehave different macroscopic structures, while showing the same microscopic morphology. Based on their morphological differences, it is expected that the combination of the CCManodeand carbon paper provides the more homogeneous removal of CO2at high currents. The authors suggest that the application of the CCManodewith an optimal anode loading improves anode mass transfer, reduces methanol crossover, and enhances the electrochemical reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reshetenko et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: