Key result
This systematic review protocol outlines the methodology to determine the rates of electrocardiogram monitoring in adults taking high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs; no results are reported.
Why the study?
High-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs pose a risk of fatal arrhythmias, but the extent of ECG monitoring used in clinical settings to mitigate this risk needs to be determined.
What is the rate of electrocardiogram monitoring in adult patients taking high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs?
Systematic Review
What is the rate of electrocardiogram monitoring in adult patients taking high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs?
This systematic review protocol outlines a methodology to determine the clinical uptake of ECG monitoring for mitigating drug-induced QT prolongation risk in adults.
Protocol sets framework to quantify ECG monitoring rates; leaves open current adherence until review completes.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to determine the rates of electrocardiogram use in adult patients taking high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs in clinical settings. This review will determine the extent of ECG monitoring being used to mitigate the risk of drug-induced QT prolongation. INTRODUCTION: High-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs pose a well-established risk of cardiac arrhythmia, including torsades de pointes, among other serious long QT syndromes, which can be fatal. Detection and mitigation of QT prolongation involves use of electrocardiogram monitoring. This systematic review will present evidence for uptake of electrocardiogram monitoring in clinical practice to support the quality use of high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Quantitative studies, published from 2004 that determine the rate of electrocardiogram monitoring before and during use of high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs in adults 18 years or older, either in community or hospital settings, will be eligible for inclusion. METHODS: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed will be searched to identify published studies. EThOS, OpenGrey, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses will be searched to identify unpublished studies. Conference abstracts will be excluded. There will be no restriction on country or language. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies, assess methodological quality, and extract data. The JBI approach to systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence will be followed. Meta-analysis will be performed, if possible, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Putnikovic et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Taking high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs. Electrocardiogram monitoring was evaluated on Rate of electrocardiogram monitoring. This systematic review protocol outlines the methodology to determine the rates of electrocardiogram monitoring in adults taking high-risk QT interval-prolonging drugs; no results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: