Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
35 brain-damaged and normal Ss were matched in pairs. They were compared on motor strength, motor speed, psychomotor skill and tactile-perceptual function including finger localization, finger-tip number writing, and form recognition for preferred and non-preferred hands. Methods of inference utilized include: level of performance, pathognomic sign and performance of the preferred vs non-preferred hands. Brain-damaged children consistently performed more poorly than control children. Motor-performance measures showed greater deficits than did tests of tactile-perception. Each method of inference (level, sign, preferred vs non-preferred hand) was validated by the results. Combined use of these methods provided complementary information concerning differences in brain-damaged and normal children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boll et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: