Key result
Allowing a nonparticulate diet for parturients who are candidates for regional anesthesia is recommended, as there is no evidence of risk in allowing oral intake or benefit in withholding fluids.
Why the study?
Does allowing oral intake increase the risk of pulmonary aspiration or anesthesia morbidity in parturients compared to traditional fasting?
Does allowing oral intake increase the risk of pulmonary aspiration or anesthesia morbidity in parturients compared to traditional fasting?
Allowing a nonparticulate diet in parturients who are candidates for regional anesthesia is recommended, as there is no evidence that it increases the risk of pulmonary aspiration.
May support relaxing fasting policies for regional anesthesia candidates; leaves open need for prospective trials on aspiration risk.
Conflict exists between satisfying the parturient's desire for oral intake and traditional restrictive standards of obstetric and anesthesia departments. Surveys of institutions providing obstetric services reveal greatly varying oral intake policy. There is neither evidence of benefit in withholding fluids nor evidence of risk in allowing them. Prolonged fasting has potential liabilities. Maternal mortality is rare, and anesthesia-related causes are not among the common etiologies. Aspiration is not a significant factor in the modern era. Higher risk for anesthesia morbidity is associated with general anesthesia, particularly difficult intubation. Instead of implicating oral intake as a risk factor for pulmonary aspiration, the literature consistently emphasizes the critical role of properly trained and dedicated obstetric anesthesia personnel. Unless parturients are not candidates for regional anesthesia, a nonparticulate diet should be allowed. Liberal use of regional anesthesia as well as antacid prophylaxis is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KW Elkington (1992) conducted a review in Laboring women (parturients). Oral intake (nonparticulate diet) vs. Withholding fluids (traditional restrictive standards) was evaluated. Allowing a nonparticulate diet for parturients who are candidates for regional anesthesia is recommended, as there is no evidence of risk in allowing oral intake or benefit in withholding fluids.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: