Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To determine long-term outcome of intraocular antagonism of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in macular oedema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: A total of 28 consecutive patients were treated with either intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in the first series and were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 5 years for their functional and anatomical outcome. RESULTS: Time between onset of macular oedema and initial treatment was 5.2 ± 0.4/0.1 ± 0.1 (IVB/IVR) months. A mean of 4 intravitreal injections were given per patients in the first 6 months. In months 7-12 intravitreal injections decreased to 2 and further decreased in the second year (months 13-18: 1.14; months 19-24: 0.5) and third year (months 25-30: 0.4; months 31-36: 0.2). After the fourth year, only two of the 28 patients received further treatment. Average visual acuity (VA) increased by 16 letters after 1 year (p < 0.01) and although not statistically significantly, by a mean of 5 letters (p = 0.3) at long-term evaluation (IVB-group). However, after mean of 5 years, central retinal sensitivity (CRS) improved by 3.6 dB (p = 0.01) and central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased by 161 μm (p = 0.02). In the IVR-group, VA and CRS increased significantly (31 letters and respectively 4.4 dB, p < 0.001) and CRT decreased by 229 μm (p < 0.001) after long-term follow-up. Final functional results were significantly better in patients with treatment initiation <3 months (79 versus 55 letters, p = 0.01). Microvascular abnormalities were detected in 88% (21 of 24 patients), hyperfluorescence in 42% (10 of 24 patients) on wide-field fluorescein angiography in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of VEGF provides substantial long-term benefits for patients with ME secondary to BRVO. Early treatment with anti-VEGF agents and extended therapeutic surveillance was associated with improved visual recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rezar et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: