Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis of four crystallographically characterized pseudo-polymorphs of tri( o -tolyl) 3 PAu(2-mercaptobenzoate)·solvent, ( o -tol) 3 PAu(2-mbaH)·solvent, featuring linear P−Au−S entities and different modes of supramolecular association depending on the nature of the included solvent molecule, have been performed. Whereas the thermal decomposition mechanisms of the four pseudo-polymorphs do not differ significantly from each other, the enthalpies of phase change do vary somewhat, indicating influence of solvent upon coherence of the crystal lattice. Crystals of ( o -tol) 3 PAu(2-mbaH)·solvent are very luminescent. UV excitation produced three emission bands for ( o -tol) 3 PAu-(2-mbaH)·solvent. Contrary to the free ligands, ( o -tol) 3 P and 2-HmbaH, the emission shapes of the Au compounds are very dependent on the excitation energy. The single excitation configuration interaction (CIS) post-Hartree−Fock (HF) calculations were performed to model the electronic structures of the free ligands and ( o -tol) 3 PAu(2-mbaH). The configurational interaction supports the notion that the observed electronic transitions of the complex are strongly associated with the charge transfer from S to Au. The assignment of the emission bands is presented in terms of the relaxed excited states responsible for the charge-transfer transitions, in which the crystal field and the vibronic interactions are taken into account as additional perturbations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yun et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: