This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) therapy provides clinical and physiological benefits, particularly in the management of acute respiratory failure. However, the performance of indigenously developed HFNC systems remains underexplored. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of oxygenation with a novel Indian-manufactured HFNC device in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: In this single-centre, participant-blinded, randomised, phase 0 study, 21 healthy volunteers, predominantly male participants; findings may not generalise. They were assigned to receive oxygen via an HFNC device at flow rates of 20, 40, or 60 LPM. Each participant received sequential FiO₂ levels of 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, and 1.00, with pre- and post-intervention ABG sampling at each stage. Physiological variables, including pO₂, pH, heart rate, and blood pressure, were monitored. Predicted pO₂ values were calculated. RESULTS: All participants completed the study without adverse events. A significant, linear increase in arterial pO₂ was observed with rising FiO₂ across all flow groups (p < 0.001), consistent with predicted values (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.74). No significant increase in pO₂ was noted with flow rate changes alone, as expected in healthy individuals. All vital parameters remained within normal clinical limits. CONCLUSION: The device demonstrated effective oxygenation and safety in healthy volunteers, with good participant tolerance. These findings support further clinical evaluation in patient populations and regulatory validation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2024/02/062209, dated: 01/02/2024.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: