Key result
Mild renal impairment had minimal influence on the relative efficacy and safety of NOACs compared to warfarin or enoxaparin across 82 reviewed publications.
Why the study?
Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) maintain efficacy and safety in patients with renal impairment?
Systematic Review
Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) maintain efficacy and safety in patients with renal impairment?
Mild renal impairment has minimal influence on the relative efficacy and safety of NOACs, suggesting renal impairment merits careful consideration but should not deter appropriate NOAC use.
Should not deter NOAC use in mild renal impairment; extends RCT evidence to this subgroup.
With the growing integration of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) into clinical practice, questions have arisen regarding their use in special populations, including groups that may have been underrepresented in clinical trials. Patients with renal impairment, particularly in the lower echelons of renal function, are one such group. In an effort to elucidate the current evidence regarding the use of NOACs in patients with renal impairment, a systematic assessment of the literature was performed. The MEDLINE database was interrogated for studies and analyses evaluating the influence of renal function on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of NOACs published from January 1, 2000, through August 2, 2017. The 82 relevant publications retrieved highlight the diversity in the NOAC class regarding the impact of renal function on drug clearance, drug exposures, and clinical trial outcomes. In several large clinical trials, subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences when patients were stratified by creatinine clearance as a measure of renal function. Efficacy findings, in particular, were largely aligned with the overall population in the included studies. However, relative risks of bleeding were shown to vary, sometimes driven by changes in bleeding event rates in the comparator arm (eg, warfarin, enoxaparin). With few exceptions, minimal influence of mild renal impairment was observed on the relative efficacy and safety of NOACs. Taken together, the evidence suggests that the presence of renal impairment merits careful consideration of anticoagulant choice but should not deter physicians from appropriate use of NOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reinhold Kreutz (2018) conducted a systematic review in Renal impairment. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Warfarin or enoxaparin was evaluated. Mild renal impairment had minimal influence on the relative efficacy and safety of NOACs compared to warfarin or enoxaparin across 82 reviewed publications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Anticoagulation in AFMore from Mayo Clinic Proceedings