PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2026PLoS Pathogens2 citationsOpen Access

Dual plasmepsin IX and X inhibitors are refractory to development of resistance

View Full Paper
PFPaola FavuzzaMDMadeline G. DansWSWenyin Su

Key Points

  • To assess and compare the potential for antimalarial resistance development against plasmepsin X-selective inhibitors versus dual plasmepsin IX and X inhibitors in Plasmodium falciparum.
  • Characterized PMX-selective compounds (WM4, WM76, WM92) and dual PMIX/X inhibitors (WM382, WM09, WM42) for parasite growth potency and enzymatic inhibition.
  • Conducted in vitro resistance selection experiments alongside Antimalarial Resistome Barcoding (AReBar) assays.
  • Evaluated resistance mechanisms via recombinant enzyme Michaelis-Menten kinetics and reverse genetics in P. falciparum.
  • Parasites acquired reduced sensitivity to PMX-selective compounds through pmx gene amplification and specific point mutations (D245N, S315P, S359P, I363L) that weaken drug binding while maintaining catalytic function.
  • Parasites failed to develop resistance to dual PMIX/X inhibitors despite prolonged selection pressure, with no pre-existing resistance detected by AReBar assays.
  • Dual PMIX/X inhibitors retained full inhibitory efficacy against parasites that had acquired decreased sensitivity to PMX-selective inhibitors.

Abstract

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) remain the cornerstone of malaria treatment, but emerging resistance threatens their efficacy. The potential for the development of drug resistance against plasmepsin X (PMX)-selective inhibitors and dual plasmepsin IX/X (PMIX/X) inhibitors was investigated in Plasmodium falciparum. A series of PMX-selective (WM4, WM76, WM92) and PMIX/X dual inhibitors (WM382, WM09, WM42) were characterised for potency against parasite growth and enzyme inhibition. In vitro selection experiments showed that all compounds had a high barrier to resistance, although parasites with reduced sensitivity to PMX‑selective inhibitors could still be selected. Resistance mechanisms involved pmx gene amplification and point mutations (D245N, S315P, S359P, I363L) that alter inhibitor binding. Recombinant expression and Michaelis-Menten kinetics demonstrated that these mutations impair drug binding whilst preserving PMX catalytic function. Reverse genetics confirmed that introducing these mutations into the pmx gene resulted in decreased potency of the inhibitors. In this study, resistance to the PMIX/X dual inhibitors evaluated here could not be selected, despite prolonged selection pressure. Antimalarial Resistome Barcoding (AReBar) assays confirmed the absence of pre-existing resistance to either inhibitor class. Critically, PMIX/X dual inhibitors maintained efficacy against parasites with decreased sensitivity to PMX-selective compounds. These findings demonstrate that dual PMIX/X inhibitors present a substantially higher barrier to resistance than PMX-selective inhibitors, informing antimalarial drug development strategies and highlighting dual-target inhibition as a promising approach to mitigate resistance risks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Favuzza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa27a0b58559d80afc72a88https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper