Why the study?
Does an initial FiO2 of 0.30 versus 0.21 reduce ongoing respiratory support when leaving the delivery room in neonates born at 32 to 35 weeks’ gestation requiring resuscitation?
RCT (n=1,818)
Unblinded
Cluster randomized crossover
Yes
Does an initial FiO2 of 0.30 versus 0.21 reduce ongoing respiratory support when leaving the delivery room in neonates born at 32 to 35 weeks’ gestation requiring resuscitation?
Initiating resuscitation with an FiO2 of 0.30 compared to 0.21 did not significantly change the proportion of moderate- to late-preterm infants receiving ongoing respiratory support upon leaving the delivery room.
Room air remains viable for initial resuscitation in 32-35 week infants; confirms no primary benefit of starting at 30% oxygen.
Importance The optimal initial fraction of inspired oxygen (F io 2 ) for delivery room resuscitation of neonates born at 32 to 35 weeks’ gestation is unknown. Objective To compare outcomes for neonates born at 32 to 35 weeks’ gestation when initiating resuscitation with F io 2 0.30 vs 0.21. Design, Setting, and Participants Unblinded, cluster randomized crossover trial in 26 Australian maternity hospitals, including tertiary, nontertiary, metropolitan, regional, public, and private sites, using a waiver of informed consent. All neonates born at participating sites at 32 to 35 weeks’ gestation without known major congenital anomalies who commenced respiratory support within 3 minutes of birth were enrolled from December 2022 to September 2025, with final follow-up in March 2026. Statistical analysis was conducted on October 29, 2025. Intervention Sites were randomly assigned to provide initial F io 2 of either 0.30 or 0.21 during the first 3 minutes of delivery room respiratory support. Sites crossed over to provide the alternative initial F io 2 halfway through their recruitment period. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was ongoing respiratory support when leaving the delivery room. Twelve secondary outcomes evaluated delivery room treatments and respiratory support until discharge. Results A total of 1818 eligible newborns (mean gestational age, 34.1 weeks; mean birth weight, 2165 g; 44.7% female) were included. Ongoing respiratory support when leaving the delivery room occurred in 700 of 964 newborns (72.6%) randomized to receive F io 2 0.30 and 626 of 854 newborns (73.3%) randomized to receive F io 2 0.21 (risk difference, −0.83 [95% CI, −4.33 to 2.67]). Of the 12 secondary outcomes, 10 were not significantly different between newborns randomized to receive F io 2 0.30 vs 0.21, while 2 were. Newborns randomized to receive F io 2 0.30 were less likely to receive higher levels of support in the delivery room, including noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (606 of 964 [62.9%] vs 560 of 854 [65.6%]), endotracheal or supraglottic airway ventilation (20 of 964 [2.1%] vs 24 of 854 [2.8%]), or cardiac compressions or epinephrine (19 of 964 [2.0%] vs 25 of 854 [2.9%]; proportional odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.52-0.95]). Fewer newborns in the F io 2 0.30 group received endotracheal ventilation beyond the delivery room (61 of 959 [6.4%] vs 79 of 852 [9.3%]; risk ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.47-0.91]). Conclusions and Relevance For neonates born at 32 to 35 weeks’ gestation, there was no difference between those commencing resuscitation with F io 2 0.30 vs F io 2 0.21 in the proportion still receiving respiratory support when leaving the delivery room. Trial Registration anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12621001267842
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peart et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Moderate- to late-preterm infants requiring delivery room resuscitation (n=1,818). Initial fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 0.30 vs. Initial fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 0.21 was evaluated on Ongoing respiratory support when leaving the delivery room (risk difference -0.83, 95% CI -4.33 to 2.67).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: