Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
September 10, 2026Frontiers in Political ScienceOpen Access

The evolution of the European space technology knowledge network

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

NPNikolaos PapaefstathiouYSYeoryios StamboulisAVApostolos Vetsikas

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Network analysis reveals growing collaboration but persistent core dominance in European space research, highlighting limits in leadership decentralization.

Key Points

  • To examine the structural evolution of the European space-technology knowledge network from 2014 to 2025 and evaluate whether peripheral and intermediate countries gained collaboration depth and leadership relative to established core nations.
  • Analyzed CORDIS metadata from 7,754 collaborative R&D projects comprising 23,167 unique participating organizations across 60 countries over four 3-year periods.
  • Constructed country-level networks across three layers: joint-project co-participation, organizational involvement depth, and formal consortium coordination leadership.
  • Classified countries into core, intermediate-potential, and peripheral categories to evaluate trajectories, weighted degree centrality, and core-linkage ratios longitudinally.
  • Germany, France, Italy, and Spain maintained central dominance across all three network layers and led the strongest collaboration dyads throughout 2014–2025.
  • Intermediate-potential countries demonstrated statistically significant increases in project-based and organization-based weighted degree centrality, but achieved no significant gains in coordination-based leadership centrality.
  • Intermediate countries decreased their organizational core-linkage ratio over time by expanding partnerships outside the four core nations, though overall structural dependence on core countries persisted.

Cite This Study

Papaefstathiou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa27a7f58559d80afc73102https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1927182
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share