Next steps for a program of research to co-design leisure participation interventions for people with spinal cord injury. A response with future directions

Q: What does this research mean for the field?

Future research on co-designing leisure participation interventions for people with spinal cord injury must address program theory and the prioritization of intervention components. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

Frederik Skovbjerg; Mette; id_orcid 0000-0002-1749-7506 Nørtoft; Matthijs Ferdinand Wouda; Peter W. Stubbs

doi:10.1080/10790268.2026.2721068

September 8, 2026Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Next steps for a program of research to co-design leisure participation interventions for people with spinal cord injury. A response with future directions

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Address commentary considerations regarding program theory and component prioritization to guide future research on co-designed leisure participation interventions.
Narrative response synthesizing methodological considerations from an ongoing intervention development program.
Structured evaluation of recommendations regarding program theory, intervention prioritization, and stakeholder-engaged co-design.
Emphasizes establishing clear program theory to understand mechanisms of change in leisure interventions.
Identifies systematic prioritization of intervention components as essential for effective tailoring and feasibility in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Methodological response details future directions for leisure interventions in spinal cord injury, highlighting the importance of program theory and prioritization.

Abstract

We thank the author of the commentary for recognizing the importance of our article (1). Three considerations were raised concerning program theory, prioritization of intervention components, and o...

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Skovbjerg et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa27a9f58559d80afc73562 https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2026.2721068

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Next steps for a program of research to co-design leisure participation interventions for people with spinal cord injury. A response with future directions

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Next steps for a program of research to co-design leisure participation interventions for people with spinal cord injury. A response with future directions

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading