Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2026JMIR Medical InformaticsOpen Access

Automated Extraction of Postoperative Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis From Computed Tomography (CT) Reports: Semisupervised Deep Learning Study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WJWonkeun JoBPBumwoo ParkJSJi‐Hoon Sim

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective study demonstrates high-accuracy extraction of cancer recurrence and metastasis from CT reports using semisupervised deep learning, highlighting effective uncertainty modeling.

Key Points

  • To develop a semisupervised deep learning framework that captures diagnostic uncertainty by classifying postoperative cancer recurrence and metastasis from CT reports into positive, negative, and uncertain categories.
  • Retrospective analysis of 288,076 postoperative CT reports from 86,083 cancer surgery patients across 11 cancer types at Asan Medical Center (2014–2021).
  • Model training and evaluation utilized 17,846 deduplicated reports for recurrence and 63,766 for metastasis, combining rule-based algorithms with medical BERT models (MedEmbed and PubMedBERT).
  • Implemented a human-in-the-loop validation framework across 3 cycles (<1% expert review, ~2,000 samples per cycle) alongside preprocessing with keyword filtering, unsupervised clustering, and evaluation via Integrated Gradients and maximum mean discrepancy testing.
  • The overall framework achieved multiclass and binary accuracies of 97.33% and 99.33% for recurrence, and 95.00% and 96.67% for metastasis, aligning with clinician intrarater consistencies of 96.88% and 93.80%.
  • Under simulated real-world conditions, PubMedBERT attained 92.58% multiclass accuracy for recurrence, whereas MedEmbed attained 93.25% binary accuracy for metastasis.
  • The model successfully captured diagnostic uncertainty in 1.4% of recurrence cases and 6.9% of metastasis cases, with rule-based algorithms outperforming several deep learning architectures in metastasis classification.

Cite This Study

Jo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa27afb58559d80afc73e72https://doi.org/10.2196/92937
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share