Comparative field study reveals that formal business investment acts as a credible commitment between rebel groups and the state in Myanmar, suggesting economic ventures sustain armed coexistence.
Why do some rebel groups establish capital-intensive formal businesses while continuing to resist integration into the state during civil wars? This article argues that such ventures are primarily established to sustain what I call symbiotic armed orders – relationships in which the state and the rebel group co-exist through simultaneous cooperation and armed competition. Capital-intensive formal businesses demonstrate the rebel group’s credible commitment to the relationship despite ongoing hostilities. Drawing on 12 months of field research on the Thai-Myanmar border, this article compares the RCSS and the KNPP, two active rebel groups in Myanmar, to demonstrate this argument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jae Hyun Park (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: