Retrospective cohort study reveals sustained intraocular pressure reduction after transluminal trabeculotomy in open-angle glaucoma, highlighting superior efficacy when combined with cataract surgery.
Purpose To report five-years follow-up on the efficacy of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) combined with or without cataract surgery (CS). Methods Chart review of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG), who underwent GATT at a single centre. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications and failure rates (reoperation or criterion A; IOP ≤18 mmHg and IOP reduction ≤20%, criterion B; IOP≤15 mmHg and reduction≤30%), were compared between combined (GATT + CS group) and standalone procedure (GATT-alone group). Risk factors for failure were investigated by logistic regression analysis. Results In the 157 eyes of 157 patients, at a mean follow-up of 55.62 ± 9.57 (range:36–72) months, IOP reduced from 24.49 ± 4.13 to 14.49 ± 6.20 mmHg, and the number of medications reduced from 2.94 ± 0.65 to 1.22 ± 1.48. By the final follow-up, the number of medications were significantly higher in the GATT-alone group than in the GATT + CS group (1.66 ± 1.68, 0.84 ± 1.17; respectively) ( p = 0.003). The GATT-alone group had significantly higher failure rates at final follow-up in the GATT group compared to GATT + CS group based on criterion A (16.7% vs 1.2%) and B (26.4% vs 11.8%) ( p < 0.001, p = 0.01; respectively). Risk factors for failure were, GATT alone procedure (OR:0.24, p = 0.01) and eyes with POAG (OR:4.74, p = 0.004) in 157 eyes, and a postoperative IOP spike (OR:7.0, p = 0.01) in the GATT-alone group. Conclusion Long-term success was achievable after GATT. The more favorable results were obtained in the GATT + CS group compared to the GATT-alone group and in the PXG eyes compared to the POAG eyes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tekcan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: