Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surveillance study reveals distinct genotype patterns and global transmission links for endemic coronaviruses in Thailand, highlighting the value of regional genomic tracking.
Endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs) HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-OC43 are common causes of acute respiratory infections (ARI), yet integrated surveillance and genomic data from Southeast Asia remain limited. We characterized HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-OC43 circulation in Thailand, during 2024-2025 using routine real-time RT-PCR testing, partial spike sequencing, and time-scaled phylogenetic analyses with global references. Among 11,709 ARI specimens, 329/8,122 were HCoV-positive in 2024 (4.05%) and 131/3,587 in 2025 (3.65%). Positivity was strongly seasonal, peaking in winter, and SARS-CoV-2 surges in the same testing stream generally coincided with lower endemic HCoV positivity. Genotype composition differed by virus: HCoV-OC43 was dominated by genotypes K and J at near-equal frequencies (48.3% and 47.2%), whereas HCoV-NL63 was mainly genotype C4 (43.6%), followed by B2 (32.7%) and C3 (20.9%). Time-scaled phylogenies placed Thai sequences across multiple regions of global diversity, consistent with repeated introductions and onward transmission within several co-circulating lineages. Estimated substitution rates were 3.86 × 10-4 substitutions/site/year for HCoV-NL63 and 9.27 × 10-4 for HCoV-OC43. Discrete-trait phylogeography supported bidirectional connectivity involving Thailand, with virus-specific differences in the most supported routes. Skygrid reconstructions suggested declines in genetic diversity after 2020, overlapping the COVID-19 era, with a more pronounced decrease for HCoV-OC43. Evidence for selection was limited and inconsistent for HCoV-NL63, whereas several HCoV-OC43 sites overlapped codon-based signals of diversifying selection. Overall, these findings provide a baseline for endemic HCoV seasonality, genotype composition, and connectivity in Thailand, and support continued genomic surveillance in Southeast Asia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puenpa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: