Validation study demonstrates automated sex classification of Chilo suppressalis via edge-cloud collaboration, highlighting feasible real-time monitoring of agricultural pest outbreaks.
The sex ratio of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker), is important for assessing reproductive potential and outbreak risk, but automated sex classification in field trap images is hindered by small targets, variable postures, subtle morphological differences and complex backgrounds. An edge–cloud collaborative system was developed for fine-grained sex classification of the rice stem borer. The edge terminal performs image acquisition, target detection, ROI extraction, and foreground enhancement, while the cloud platform conducts sex classification and result management. To improve small-target localization, YOLO-CSNet was constructed by integrating a global attention mechanism and adaptive spatial feature fusion into YOLO11n. Within detection-constrained ROIs, Haar-like features and an AdaBoost discriminator were used to suppress tray textures, shadows and non-target regions. For sex classification, DRS-ViT combines convolutional patch embedding, a discriminative-region soft-weighting module and a KANsformer encoder to represent weak sex-related cues and model global structural relationships. YOLO-CSNet achieved precision, recall, mAP@0.5, and mAP@0.5:0.95 values of 94.36%, 93.19%, 95.32%, and 73.95%, respectively. DRS-ViT achieved accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values of 93.93%, 94.68%, 93.29%, and 93.91%, respectively. In a temporally independent field deployment conducted at one Shandong site from May to June 2026, the system achieved an image-upload success rate of 91.7% and an end-to-end accuracy of 87.9%. The field results support the feasibility of the workflow under the tested conditions. Future work will extend field validation across multiple sites and seasons to evaluate system generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: