Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study reveals a 3.27% annual electricity reduction via controlled night ventilation in a Bahraini residential building model, indicating seasonal passive cooling benefits.
Residential electricity demand in Bahrain is strongly shaped by long cooling seasons, high air-conditioning dependence and the operation of standardised housing typologies. This paper evaluates the energy and comfort implications of applying a controlled night-ventilation mixed-mode strategy to a representative Bahraini Ministry of Housing residential unit. The study compares two DesignBuilder/EnergyPlus scenarios: S0, a replicated closed-window baseline with split air-conditioning at a 24 °C cooling setpoint, and S1, a controlled mixed-mode case in which windows are available only during night-time periods when outdoor conditions are suitable for passive cooling. The base model is grounded in a published and validated Bahraini residential dataset containing geometry, construction properties, schedules, HVAC assumptions and monthly electricity bills, and was cross-checked against this dataset (see Methods for the monthly error statistics used to qualify this comparison). The replicated baseline produced 34,729.46 kWh/year, which differs from the published reference value of 34,720.19 kWh/year by only 0.027%. The S1 case reduced annual simulated electricity consumption to 33,593.04 kWh/year, corresponding to a saving of 1136.42 kWh/year, or 3.27% relative to S0. The benefit was highly seasonal: January, February, March and December accounted for 96.2% of the annual saving, while May to September showed no meaningful reduction. Hourly January outputs showed 425 zero-cooling hours out of 744 h (57.1%), cooling electricity of 87.32 kWh and a mean operative temperature of 23.81 °C. January thermal-comfort indicators (mean PMV +0.94; only 0.5% of hours within the ±0.5 PMV band) show that the strategy delivers real electricity savings but does not, on the PMV metric, guarantee acceptable comfort in every hour; the strategy is therefore best understood as a seasonal, humidity-aware operational measure that reduces cooling electricity in cooler months while carrying a thermal-comfort trade-off that requires either a tighter control-temperature threshold or explicit acceptance of a wider comfort range. Because the strategy yields no savings during the peak summer months, it should be positioned as a complement to—not a substitute for—envelope and HVAC-efficiency upgrades, and its economic case under Bahrain’s subsidised electricity tariff is modest and is presented here as indicative potential rather than a demonstrated payback benefit. By reducing residential cooling electricity without requiring building-fabric retrofit, the findings support the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy), SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities) and SDG 13 (climate action), by contributing to sustainable, low-carbon operation of the residential building stock in hot–arid Gulf climates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali Sedki (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: