Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study finds limited associations between prenatal wildfire smoke exposure and fetal growth in US births, suggesting minimal overall impact on birth weight outcomes.
Background: Increasing exposure to wildfire fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) may pose unique risks to fetal development. We assessed associations between prenatal wildfire PM 2.5 exposure and fetal growth outcomes, including birth weight at term, birth weight for gestational age z -scores, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age in the U.S. Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes Cohort. Methods: The study included 20,034 births (2006–2020) from 30 cohort sites nationwide. We assigned daily wildfire PM 2.5 at census-tract resolution and summarized average concentrations and the number of smoke days exceeding multiple intensity thresholds across pregnancy. We used covariate-adjusted mixed-effects models to estimate overall associations and distributed lag models and trimester-specific analyses to evaluate critical exposure windows across gestation, and we examined potential effect modification by US region, fetal sex, maternal race, and neighborhood poverty. Results: Pregnancy wildfire exposure metrics, including mean prenatal PM 2.5 and the number of smoke days, were not associated with study outcomes. Distributed lag and trimester-specific models did not show consistent sensitive windows of exposure associated with birth weight at term, birth weight for gestational age z -scores, or small for gestational age. A positive association was observed between higher early-pregnancy wildfire exposure and large for gestational age (odds ratio = 1.015 per smoke day, 95% confidence interval: 1.001, 1.029), though effect estimates were small in magnitude. No consistent effect modification was identified. Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort, wildfire PM 2.5 showed limited associations with fetal growth outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: