Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study demonstrates equivalent postoperative astigmatism in presbyopic eyes, suggesting lens selection requires individualized axis-magnitude analysis.
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of preoperative astigmatism magnitude and axis on the selection between non-toric and low-powered trifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their comparative refractive outcomes. Setting: Memira by Bergman Clinics, Norway; HO Londrina – Hospital de Olhos, Brazil. Design: Multicenter, retrospective, interventional cohort study. Methods: Consecutive eyes designated for non-toric (T00) or low-powered toric (T20) trifocal IOLs based exclusively on Barrett Toric Calculator recommendations were analyzed. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were utilized to adjust for inter-eye correlation. Outcomes included preoperative corneal astigmatism (magnitude and axis), estimated residual astigmatism, and postoperative manifest astigmatism, evaluated with double-angle and linear distribution plots. Results: The cohort comprised 1,628 eyes (T00: 786; T20: 842). The calculator’s recommendation between T00 and T20 varied continuously based on both preoperative magnitude and axis. Despite the T20 group having significantly higher preoperative corneal astigmatism ( P <0.001), postoperative manifest astigmatism was statistically equivalent between groups (T00: 0.26±0.26 D vs. T20: 0.24±0.26 D; P =0.634). No significant differences were observed in visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, safety, or efficacy indices ( P >0.05). However, the T00 group demonstrated higher estimated than achieved postoperative astigmatism (0.33±0.16 D vs. 0.26±0.26 D), whereas the T20 group showed lower estimated than achieved astigmatism (0.10±0.08 D vs. 0.24±0.26 D). Conclusion: The decision between a non-toric versus a low-powered toric IOL relies on an individualized interdependence between magnitude and axis rather than a fixed magnitude-based cutoff. This individualized, calculator-driven approach was associated with comparable postoperative astigmatism between groups, regardless of their baseline differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brenner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: