Experimental study reveals distinct microwear patterns across working techniques on pearl shell valves, highlighting tool efficiencies in ancient Polynesian shell artefact production.
Pinctada margaritifera (black‐lipped pearl oyster) artefacts are ubiquitous in the archaeological record throughout the Pacific and particularly in Polynesia. Despite efforts towards the development of typologies, the lack of microwear and use‐wear studies has prevented the development of technological approaches. We used 20 pearl shell valves to test, examine and create a reference for the development of microwear traces and to test proposed chaîne opératoires of Polynesian pearl shell tools. Experimental actions include removing the outer shell, the proteinaceous periostracum and prismatic layers, sawing, percussion, filing, cutting and drilling. Results indicate pearl shell is hard and time‐consuming to work, with some materials more effective than others in working it, including pearl shell and sea urchin spines for grooving, vesicular basalt with a slurry of sand and water for abrasion, Carcharhinus melanopterus tooth for perforation or cutting, and Pocillopora coral for filing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGloin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: