Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational modeling study demonstrates cross-scale blast pressure redistribution and damage control in granite tunnels, suggesting optimal water-decking parameters for smooth excavation.
Water-decking can buffer and redistribute borehole loading, but the coupled effects of axial charge segmentation, radial decoupling, and peripheral-hole spacing across scales remain insufficiently quantified. A cross-scale three-dimensional multi-material Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) framework coupled with the Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma (RHT) damage model was developed for intact granite and applied at single-hole, double-hole, and full-face scales following specimen-scale calibration and numerical consistency checks. Increasing the segment count from four to six reduced the charge-section peak pressure from 283.0 to 257.0 MPa while increasing the water-section peak from 24.5 to 50.7 MPa. Increasing the radial decoupling coefficient from 1.00 to 1.31 reduced the numerical damage span from 55.6 to 33.7 cm. The spacing–decoupling assessment identified the six-segment configuration with Kd = 1.31 and 65 cm spacing as a condition-specific combination that maintained inter-hole damage connectivity while limiting outward disturbance. In the full-face model, multi-hole stress-wave interaction occurred at approximately 0.48–0.52 ms. The D ≥ 0.19 and D ≥ 0.90 damaged regions occupied 2.154% and 0.348% of the representative section, respectively. These results support a sequential axial–radial–spatial regulation framework linking pressure redistribution and inter-hole interaction to full-face stress and damage evolution, providing a basis for smooth-blasting parameter selection under the investigated intact-granite conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: