Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined whether pre-to-post changes after four weeks differed among core training (CT), functional training (FT), and inactive control (CG) groups in male soccer players. Thirty participants (18-25 years; n=10/group) were allocated to CT, FT, or CG. CT and FT completed 45-60 min sessions three times weekly, whereas CG received no additional structured training. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), isometric back strength, vertical jump, Lewis-estimated anaerobic power, and unilateral/bilateral balance were assessed before and after the intervention. An omnibus MANOVA tested the multivariate Group × Time effect using pre-to-post change scores, followed by outcome-specific 3 × 2 mixed-design analyses. The omnibus effect was not significant (Wilks' Λ=.367, F(16,40)=1.629, p=.106). Nominal Group × Time interactions were non-significant for seven outcomes (p>.05). Right-foot balance showed a nominal interaction, F(2,27)=4.075, p=.028, ηp²=.232, but this did not remain significant after Holm correction across eight outcomes (adjusted p=.227). An exploratory Tukey comparison suggested greater improvement in FT than CG (p=.022). Thus, the data do not provide robust evidence that CT or FT was superior to control across the assessed outcomes. The isolated right-foot balance signal should be considered hypothesis-generating given the non-significant omnibus test and small sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aslan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: